Discrete Counting of Short Lived Isotopes With Low Background Detectors (Paperback) (ISBN-13: 9781288282395)

We consider radiation counting experiments used to measure quantities of materials that are short-lived with respect to the count durations. The HPS 13.31 statistical analysis seriously overestimates the uncertainty when the quantity and background are very low. We consider the case in which the objective is to quantify the number of atoms, n, that were present in a sample when it was drawn. Mathews and Gerts [JRNC, 2008] analyzed this case and developed formulas for the probability distribution of n, in order to develop experiment design processes that minimize the smallest detectable quantity of material, thus maximizing sensitivity for the detection problem. We extend their effort to the quantification problem: designing such experiments to find the count duration that yields the lowest possible minimum quantifiable quantity, given the other measurement parameters. A value of n is quantifiable if the precision of the measurement, defined as the width of the confidence interval for n divided by the mean value of It is sufficiently likely to be better than a specified precision tolerance. Our analysis and methods are confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.