Folkestone Ritual Case: The Argument Delivered Before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (January 23-February 1, 1877) in the Case of Ridsdal (Paperback) (ISBN-13: 9781145641679)

Folkestone Ritual Case presents the complete legal argument delivered before the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the landmark case of Ridsdale v. Clifton, heard from January 23 to February 1, 1877. This meticulously transcribed record offers a deep dive into the complex ecclesiastical laws and ritualistic practices debated during the proceedings. The case, involving Charles Joseph Ridsdale and William Clifton, delves into the nuances of religious ceremony and the extent to which they align with established doctrine.

Featuring contributions from eminent legal minds such as James Fitzjames Stephen, Archibald John Stephens, and James Plaisted Wilde Penzance, the book provides invaluable insights into the legal interpretations and arguments surrounding religious ritualism in late 19th-century England. Benno Loewy's involvement further enriches the historical context.

This volume is an essential resource for legal scholars, historians of religion, and anyone interested in the intersection of law, religion, and society in Victorian England. The 'Folkestone Ritual Case' remains a pivotal study in understanding the tensions between tradition, reform, and legal precedent within the Church of England.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.