Before you leave...
Take 20% off your first order
20% off
Enter the code below at checkout to get 20% off your first order
Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse (Paperback) (ISBN-13: 9781517054151)
Vendor:
Michael M. Nikoletseas
Product type:
Books
- $29.95
$29.95- $29.95
- Unit price
- per
Subtotal:
$29.95
Description
x"Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse" by Michael M. Nikoletseas
Harvard University Libraries.
Overview and Context
"Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse" by Michael M. Nikoletseas, published in 2015 (ISBN-13: 978-1517054151, ISBN-10: 151705415X), reinterprets the philosophical relationship between Heraclitus and Parmenides, two key pre-Socratic thinkers. Traditionally, Heraclitus is known for his doctrine of flux ("panta rhei," everything flows) and Parmenides for his emphasis on permanence and being, often seen as opposing views. Nikoletseas challenges this dichotomy, arguing that Parmenides extensively paraphrased and built upon Heraclitus's ideas, particularly the concept of "logos" as a formal system for understanding nature, transforming it into his own concept of "tò eón" (Being). The book, spanning 159 pages, includes a preface, sections on key themes, paraphrasis of individual fragments, an epilogue, bibliography, and appendices with fragments of both philosophers. Evaluation and Critique Strengths
- **Textual Analysis**: The book's strength lies in its detailed comparison of fragments, providing specific examples like Parmenides 5 and Heraclitus 103, supporting the paraphrasing claim. This is valuable for scholars, as seen in its listing on PhilPapers ([Michael M. Nikoletseas, Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse] - **Interdisciplinary Approach**: Connecting ancient philosophy to modern science (e.g., Galileo, Kant) is innovative, appealing to historians of science, as noted on Academia.edu ([PDF] Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse]. - **Challenging Traditional Views**: Nikoletseas challenges the flux vs. permanence dichotomy, aligning with some scholarly views (e.g., Nehamas 2002, via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Heraclitus], suggesting more common ground Potential Criticism
- **Overstatement of Influence**: Some may argue Parmenides developed his own ideas, not merely paraphrasing, given traditional views of their opposition (e.g., [Heraclitus vs. Parmenides: The Problem of Change]( The extent of influence remains debated.
- **Anachronistic Projections**: Projecting modern scientific concepts onto ancient texts could be seen as anachronistic, though Nikoletseas grounds claims in fragments, as seen on page 94. Relevance and Audience
The book is highly relevant for philosophers, classicists, and historians of science, particularly those interested in pre-Socratic thought and its scientific implications. Its dense scholarly style, with original Greek and fragment comparisons, may challenge lay readers, but the preface and epilogue provide accessible insights. It aligns with Nikoletseas's broader oeuvre, listed on Goodreads ([Books by Michael M. Nikoletseas]( suggesting a consistent focus on epistemology and natural science. Comparative Analysis
Compared to works like Kahn, C. H. (1979), "The Art and Thought of Heraclitus," which focuses on cosmology, Nikoletseas emphasizes epistemology, aligning with Heisenberg, W. (1959), "Physics and Philosophy," though the latter seeks analogies with modern physics. His approach is systematic, grouping fragments thematically, and his critique of Plato and Aristotle's influence echoes Graham, D. W. (2009), "Explaining the Cosmos." Conclusion
"Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse" is a significant scholarly contribution, offering a novel interpretation that challenges traditional views and bridges ancient philosophy with modern science. While not without controversy, particularly regarding the extent of Parmenides's dependence on Heraclitus, Nikoletseas's detailed analysis and interdisciplinary approach make it a valuable resource for academic audiences. It invites further exploration of pre-Socratic thought, reinforcing their enduring relevance.
.
Author: Michael M. Nikoletseas
ISBN-10: 151705415X
ISBN-13: 9781517054151
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Language: English
Published: 09/03/2015
Pages: 160
Format: Paperback
Weight: 0.49lbs
Size: 9.00h x 6.00w x 0.34d
Harvard University Libraries.
Overview and Context
"Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse" by Michael M. Nikoletseas, published in 2015 (ISBN-13: 978-1517054151, ISBN-10: 151705415X), reinterprets the philosophical relationship between Heraclitus and Parmenides, two key pre-Socratic thinkers. Traditionally, Heraclitus is known for his doctrine of flux ("panta rhei," everything flows) and Parmenides for his emphasis on permanence and being, often seen as opposing views. Nikoletseas challenges this dichotomy, arguing that Parmenides extensively paraphrased and built upon Heraclitus's ideas, particularly the concept of "logos" as a formal system for understanding nature, transforming it into his own concept of "tò eón" (Being). The book, spanning 159 pages, includes a preface, sections on key themes, paraphrasis of individual fragments, an epilogue, bibliography, and appendices with fragments of both philosophers. Evaluation and Critique Strengths
- **Textual Analysis**: The book's strength lies in its detailed comparison of fragments, providing specific examples like Parmenides 5 and Heraclitus 103, supporting the paraphrasing claim. This is valuable for scholars, as seen in its listing on PhilPapers ([Michael M. Nikoletseas, Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse] - **Interdisciplinary Approach**: Connecting ancient philosophy to modern science (e.g., Galileo, Kant) is innovative, appealing to historians of science, as noted on Academia.edu ([PDF] Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse]. - **Challenging Traditional Views**: Nikoletseas challenges the flux vs. permanence dichotomy, aligning with some scholarly views (e.g., Nehamas 2002, via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Heraclitus], suggesting more common ground Potential Criticism
- **Overstatement of Influence**: Some may argue Parmenides developed his own ideas, not merely paraphrasing, given traditional views of their opposition (e.g., [Heraclitus vs. Parmenides: The Problem of Change]( The extent of influence remains debated.
- **Anachronistic Projections**: Projecting modern scientific concepts onto ancient texts could be seen as anachronistic, though Nikoletseas grounds claims in fragments, as seen on page 94. Relevance and Audience
The book is highly relevant for philosophers, classicists, and historians of science, particularly those interested in pre-Socratic thought and its scientific implications. Its dense scholarly style, with original Greek and fragment comparisons, may challenge lay readers, but the preface and epilogue provide accessible insights. It aligns with Nikoletseas's broader oeuvre, listed on Goodreads ([Books by Michael M. Nikoletseas]( suggesting a consistent focus on epistemology and natural science. Comparative Analysis
Compared to works like Kahn, C. H. (1979), "The Art and Thought of Heraclitus," which focuses on cosmology, Nikoletseas emphasizes epistemology, aligning with Heisenberg, W. (1959), "Physics and Philosophy," though the latter seeks analogies with modern physics. His approach is systematic, grouping fragments thematically, and his critique of Plato and Aristotle's influence echoes Graham, D. W. (2009), "Explaining the Cosmos." Conclusion
"Parmenides: Paraphrasing Heraclitus in Verse" is a significant scholarly contribution, offering a novel interpretation that challenges traditional views and bridges ancient philosophy with modern science. While not without controversy, particularly regarding the extent of Parmenides's dependence on Heraclitus, Nikoletseas's detailed analysis and interdisciplinary approach make it a valuable resource for academic audiences. It invites further exploration of pre-Socratic thought, reinforcing their enduring relevance.
.
Author: Michael M. Nikoletseas
ISBN-10: 151705415X
ISBN-13: 9781517054151
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
Language: English
Published: 09/03/2015
Pages: 160
Format: Paperback
Weight: 0.49lbs
Size: 9.00h x 6.00w x 0.34d
By Michael M. Nikoletseas
xNikoletseas Michael M. Professor of Medicine, philosopher, classicist. He studied Psychology (B.A. with Honors, 1969-1973), Psychobiology (Rutgers University, M.S., PhD, 1973-1978), postdoctoral studies at the Medical College of Pennsylvania and University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. He taught at the School of Medicine of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, WI, and UPR. Visiting professor at the University of Texas at Houston School of Medicine. Parents: Johannes Peter Müller (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) -> Hermann von Helmholtz (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) -> Wilhelm Max Wundt (Universität Leipzig) -> Edward B. Titchener (Cornell University) -> John Paul Nafe-> Clarence Graham (Columbia University) -> William S. Verplank, Jr. (Indiana University Bloomington)-> George H. Collier (Rutgers University) -> Michael M. Nikoletseas
Recently Viewed Products
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.