Subjective Audio Quality Over a Secure IEEE 802.11n Draft 2.0 Wireless Local Area Network (Paperback) (ISBN-13: 9781249834533)

This thesis investigates the quality of audio generated by a G.711 codec and transmission over an IEEE 802.11n draft 2.0 wireless local are network (WLAN). Decline in audio quality due to additional calls or by securing the WLAN with Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) is quantified. Audio quality over an IEEE 802.11n draft 2.0 WLAN is also compared to that of IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.11g WLANs under the same conditions. Audio quality is evaluated as Mean Opinion Score (MOS), calculated as the average subjective audio quality score given for each WLAN configuration. Results suggest that audio quality over an IEEE 802.11n draft 2.0 WLAN is not higher than over an IEEE 802.11b WLAN when up to 10 simultaneous G.711 calls occur. A linear regression of the subjective scores also suggest that an IEEE 802.11n draft 2.0 WLAN can sustain an MOS greater than 3.0 (fair quality) for up to 75 simultaneous G.711 calls secured with WPA2, or up to 40 calls secured with both WPA2 and transport mode IPsec. The data strongly suggest that toll quality audio (MOS gt; 4.0) is not practical over WPA2-secured IEEE 802.11 WLANs.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.