The Changing Role of Airpower Against Transnational Sanctuaries (Paperback) (ISBN-13: 9781286866436)

Since 9/11 the US has relied on the use of airpower to strike terrorists in transnational sanctuaries. Remarkably, the recent use of airpower against transnational terrorists has often been controlled/directed by the CIA rather than the military, though both have played a role. Additionally, following the attacks on 9/11, the employment of airpower has focused on single attacks by single aircraft versus the strike packages normally employed by countries against transnational threats up through the 1990's. The literature on this topic though, is limited to minor references in most books and articles dealing with terrorism and insurgencies since 9/11. Few detailed studies, and nothing in Air Force Doctrine specifically cover the history of and reasoning behind choosing airpower to attack transnational sanctuaries or the strengths and limitations of airpower in that role since 9/11. Following World War II, most western nations experience of war has not been conventional but rather, various forms of irregular warfare. Examples include the French in Algeria and Vietnam, the South Africans and Rhodesians in southern Africa, the US in Vietnam and Central America, the Soviets in Afghanistan and the Israeli's since 1973 in Lebanon and the occupied territories.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.